FS Fitness to Practise Procedures
Application
Health professional students and staff members of the Faculty of Science (FS) at the University.
Note - The fitness to practise regime applies to health professional students whether they are on campus, on placement or elsewhere.
Purpose
To detail the procedures to be used when dealing with issues concerning a health professional student's fitness to practise.
Procedures
Scope
1. The FTP Policy and the FTP Procedures encompass fitness to practise concerns in three areas:
Health or personal issues
Health or personal issues that may affect a student’s future ability to practise as a health professional, include issues such as (but not limited to):
- mental health issues
- physical impairment
- highly transmissible viral infections
- drug and alcohol issues
Note 1 - Such issues are likely to affect a student’s studies, progression or career pathways; expose the student, patients or staff members to potential risk, and/or expose the faculty or partner organisation to potential risk.
Note 2 – The issues may have different impacts depending on the discipline.
Professional attitudes and behaviours
Issues of concern relating to professional attitudes and behaviours during the programme include issues such as:
- plagiarism
- poor attendance
- inappropriate behaviour
- contravention of significant aspects of policy or protocol e.g. sensitive examinations
Note - Such issues may involve a single serious incident or involve a series of minor concerns which may or may not be related.
Issues external to the programme
Issues of concern regarding the actions of students occurring outside the programme, include a student committing a criminal offence. Where a student is convicted, is granted a discharge without conviction or is granted diversion by the police with regard to such an offence, the student must disclose this information to the head of programme
Note - Such offences include drink driving and drug offences. A discharge without conviction usually requires a plea of guilty to be entered prior to being granted to indicate acceptance of responsibility for the commission of the offence. Diversion will usually require an acceptance of responsibility before being granted by the police.
Classification of issues
2. Fitness to practise issues are to be classified into one of three groups, according to the features applicable to each category:
Non-critical
Non-critical issues are those that raise concerns about future fitness to practise that would best be dealt with through support and counselling.
Note - Examples would include poor attendance, some lesser types of inappropriate behaviour.
Critical
Critical issues are those that raise more significant concerns regarding a student's future fitness to practise.
Note - Examples would include dishonesty, serious health issues (persistent or serious),
significant contravention of a policy, drug and alcohol abuse.
Three repeated non-critical concerns will usually escalate to ’critical’.
Extraordinarily critical
An extraordinarily critical issue is an event giving rise to the need for immediate action because of the likelihood of significant harm, either involving a student, or resulting from the action of a student.
Referral process and disposal of issues relating to fitness to practise
General
3. Any concern about a student's fitness to practise that comes to the attention of a staff member must be reported in writing and dealt with in accordance with these procedures.
4. The fitness to practise process is to be commenced by referral through different pathways depending on the nature of the concern, the classification of the issue and its criticality.
It is anticipated that most referrals of a health professional student will come from a programme director or major / specialisation leader or equivalent, deputy head (academic) or equivalent or head of school/department, but any academic staff member of FS may refer a health professional student to the fitness to practise process.
- A student may make referrals, but only to the Deputy Head (Academic) or equivalent, or Programme Director or Major / Specialisation Leader or equivalent.
- Health professional students are encouraged to self-refer to the fitness to practise process
- Anonymous referrals of a student for fitness to practise consideration will not be considered
- A fair process is to be followed when dealing with all fitness to practise issues
5. Where a fitness to practise issue involves a Tuākana student, the FS kaiārahi is to be consulted with throughout the fitness to practise process, as appropriate in the circumstances.
Health and personal issues
Referral
6. The matter is to be referred to the Deputy Head (Academic) or equivalent, who will assess, in the first instance, whether the concern about a student's health or personal issue is potentially non-critical, critical or extraordinarily critical. In carrying out this assessment, the Deputy Head (Academic) or equivalent may take advice, including from the chair of the FTP Committee.
7. Where the student's health or personal issue appears to be extraordinarily critical, the Deputy Head (Academic) or equivalent, must refer the matter directly and immediately to the deputy dean and to the relevant head of school/head of department.
Action
8. Where the student's health or personal issue is assessed by the Deputy Head (Academic) or equivalent to be either non-critical or critical, the student will devise an action plan addressing the concerns, to be agreed with the Deputy Head (Academic) or equivalent and Programme Director or Major / Specialisation Leader or equivalent and/or the head of school/head of department, as appropriate in the circumstances.
9. Where the deputy dean considers that the student's health or personal issue is extraordinarily critical, the deputy dean may suspend the student from lectures, classes and any clinical attachment. In such case the head of school/head of department is to ensure that the relevant course co-ordinator or equivalents are informed that the student will not be attending the components of the programme specified.
Note - Suspension from the programme will lead automatically to withdrawal from any clinical attachment.
Anticipated outcomes
10. Where the student's health or personal issue of concern is non-critical, it is anticipated that the agreed plan of action will deal with the concerns relating to the student's fitness to practise, and that the student will be able to continue with their study in the programme. Such an outcome is also anticipated where the student's health or personal issue of concern is critical, however, in some such cases, it may be agreed by the Deputy Head (Academic) or equivalent and the head of school/head of department that the student may take a period of leave from study. Such leave requires approval under the applicable programme regulations.
11. For critical health and personal concerns, the head of school/head of department may form the view at any point prior to the agreement of an action plan or during the period of an action plan that a student has persistent or serious health or personal issues that are likely to affect adversely the student's fitness to practise. Where the head of school/head of department forms this view, the head of school/head of department may interview the student with a view to encouraging the student to withdraw from the programme and advise the student to notify the relevant health profession authority. Where the student elects to withdraw from the programme, the head of school/head of department may also recommend that the dean notify such authority. In the event that the student does not withdraw from the programme voluntarily, the head of school/head of department must refer the matter to the chair of the FTP Committee.
12. Where the student's health or personal issue is considered to be extraordinarily critical, the head of school/head of department must refer the matter immediately to the chair of the FTP Committee.
13. The full process for dealing with fitness to practise concerns relating to health or personal issues is shown in matrix form at Table 1 below.
Note - the requirements for record keeping and reporting of fitness to practise matters are dealt with in the table.
Table 1: Health or personal issues
Extraordinarily critical
For extraordinarily critical health or personal issues
Refer to: Deputy Dean and Head of School/ head of department
Action: Suspension from the programme, including withdrawal from clinical attachment, OR refer matter to chair of FTP Committee
Anticipated outcomes: Resolution by FTP Committee panel
Record keeping and reporting: FTP Committee panel decision/recommendation to Dean and Dean's decision recorded in student file
Non-critical | Critical | |
---|---|---|
Refer to | Deputy Head (Academic) | Deputy Head (Academic) |
Action | Student to devise an action plan to be agreed with Deputy Head (Academic) and the relevant programme director or Major/specialisation leader or equivalent and/or head of school/head of department |
Student to devise an action plan to be agreed with Deputy Head (Academic) and the relevant programme director or Major/specialisation leader or equivalent and/or head of school/head of department (unless issue is persistent or serious) |
Anticipated outcomes | Student may continue with their study | Student may continue with their study or defer If persistent or serious:
|
Record keeping and reporting | Report and notes kept on student file (Report held confidentially by Deputy Head (Academic) in case of illness) |
Report and notes kept on student file (Report held confidentially by Deputy Head (Academic) in case of illness) |
Professional Attitudes and Behaviours
Referral
15. Any concerns about a student's professional attitudes or behaviours are to be referred to the programme director or major / specialisation leader or equivalent who will assess, in the first instance, whether such concerns are potentially non-critical, critical or extraordinarily critical. In carrying out this assessment, the programme director or major / specialisation leader or equivalent may take advice, including from the head of school/head of department.
16. Where the student's professional attitudes or behaviours are considered to be extraordinarily critical, the the programme director or major / specialisation leader or equivalent must refer the matter immediately to the deputy dean and head of school/head of department.
Action
17. Where the student's professional attitudes or behaviours are determined by the the programme director or major / specialisation leader or equivalent to be non-critical, the student will be given remediation advice and guidance.
18. Where the student's professional attitudes or behaviours are considered to be critical, the head of school or head/head of department will ensure that the matter is investigated as soon as is reasonably practicable and a written report submitted to him/her before deciding what further action to take.
19. Where the student's professional attitudes or behaviours are considered to be extraordinarily critical, the deputy dean may suspend the student from lectures, classes and any clinical attachment. In such case the head of school/head of department is to ensure that the relevant course co-ordinator or equivalents are informed that the student will not be attending the components of the programme specified.
Note - Suspension from the programme will lead automatically to withdrawal from any clinical attachment.
Anticipated Outcomes
20. Where the student's professional attitudes or behaviours are determined as being non-critical, it is anticipated that the student may continue to study in the programme.
21. Where, after investigation, the student's professional attitudes or behaviours are considered to be critical, the head of school/head of department will refer the matter to the chair of the FTP Committee.
22. Where the student's professional attitudes or behaviours are considered to be extraordinarily critical, the head of school/head of department will refer the matter to the chair of the FTP Committee.
23. The full process for dealing with fitness to practise concerns relating to professional attitudes or behaviours is shown in the matrix at Table 2 below.
Note - the requirements for record keeping and reporting of fitness to practise matters are dealt with in the table.
Table 2: Professional attitudes and behaviours
Extraordinarily critical
For extraordinarily critical professional attitudes and behaviours
Refer to: Deputy Dean and Head of School/Head of Department
Action: Suspension from the programme or withdrawal from clinical attachment
Anticipated outcomes: Refer to chair of FTP Committee
Record keeping and reporting: FTP Committee panel decision/recommendation to Dean and Dean's decision recorded in student file
Non-critical | Critical | |
---|---|---|
Refer to | The programme director or major / specialisation leader or equivalent | The programme director or major / specialisation leader or equivalent |
Action | Remediation advice and guidance | Investigation of incident Written report provided to the head of school/ head of department |
Anticipated outcomes | Student may continue their study | Refer to chair of FTP Committee |
Record keeping and reporting | Report held on student file | Report held on student file If referred to FTP Committee, decision/recommendation to Dean recorded in student file |
Issues external to the programme
Referral
25. Students must bring to the attention of the Provost or delegate any issue that may affect their future ability to register as a health professional with the relevant registration body.
Note - Issues in this category will often involve a criminal conviction.
26. The Deputy Head (Academic) or equivalent will assess, in the first instance, whether the issue is potentially non-critical, critical or extraordinarily critical.
Action
27. Where the Deputy Head (Academic) or equivalent assesses the matter to be non-critical, the Provost or delegate will provide, or refer the student for, remediation advice and guidance.
28. Where the Deputy Head (Academic) or equivalent assesses the matter to be critical or extraordinarily critical the Deputy Head (Academic) or equivalent will refer the matter to the head of school/head of department with a recommendation that it be referred to the chair of the FTP Committee.
29. Where the issue external to the programme is considered to be extraordinarily critical, the deputy dean may suspend the student from lectures, classes and any clinical attachment. In such case the head of school/head of department is to ensure that the relevant course co-ordinator or equivalents are informed that the student will not be attending the components of the programme specified.
Note - Suspension from the programme will lead automatically to withdrawal from any clinical attachment.
Anticipated outcomes
30. Where the matter is determined to be non-critical, it is anticipated that the student may continue with their study in the programme.
31. Where the matter is determined to be critical or extraordinarily critical the FTP Committee panel will determine the matter or make a recommendation to the Dean.
Note - The outcome will necessarily be dependent on the nature of the fitness to practise concern arising.
32. The full process for dealing with fitness to practise concerns relating to issues external to the programme is shown in the matrix at Table 3 below.
Note - the requirements for record keeping and reporting of fitness to practise matters are dealt with in the table.
Table 3: Issues external to the programme
Extraordinarily critical
For extraordinarily critical issues external to the programme
Refer to: Deputy Dean and Deputy Head (Academic) or equivalent
Action: Suspension from the programme or withdrawal from clinical attachment
Anticipated outcomes: FTP Committee panel to decide matter or make recommendation to Dean
Record keeping and reporting: FTP Committee panel decision/recommendation to Dean and Dean's decision recorded in student file
Non-critical | Critical | |
---|---|---|
Refer to | Deputy Head (Academic) or equivalent | Deputy Head (Academic) or equivalent |
Action | Provide student advice and guidance | Refer to head of school/head of department for referral to chair of the FTP Committee |
Anticipated outcomes | Student may continue their study | FTP Committee panel to decide matter or make recommendation to Dean |
Record keeping and reporting | Report held on student file | FTP Committee panel decision/recommendation to Dean and Dean's decision recorded in student file |
Fitness to practise committee
Referral procedure
34. A referral to the FTP Committee must be sent to the chair of the FTP Committee who will decide, after such consultation as the chair considers appropriate, whether the matter should be dealt with by a FTP Committee panel or referred back to the relevant unit for disposal.
Constitution of the FTP Committee panel
35. Where the chair determines that the matter is to be dealt with by an FTP Committee panel, the chair will appoint members to the panel to hear the matter.
36. The chair of the FTP Committee is ex officio a member and chair of the FTP Committee panel. The chair must ensure that at least one senior members of the school/ department that delivers the programme being studied by the student are appointed as members of the FTP Committee panel.
37. A specialist member may be appointed if the chair considers this appropriate having regard to the fitness to practise matter being considered.
Note - Membership of the panel (which must be no fewer than five members, including the chair) should be decided according to the needs of the particular case being referred. For example, membership may differ in composition according to whether the case involves conduct or is health-related.
38. The chair of the FTP Committee must not appoint any person to the panel who has had prior involvement in the fitness to practise matter under consideration.
Note –The chair of the FTP Committee is ex officio a member of the panel. The chair is therefore automatically a member of the panel and is not required to be specifically appointed to the panel.
39. After deciding the membership of the panel, the chair will direct that the FTP Committee panel convene on a specified date and time to hear the matter.
Pre-meeting procedure
40. The head of school/ head of department will notify the student, in writing, when the student’s case will be heard by the FTP Committee panel, inform the student of the reasons behind the referral, and provide to the student the material that will be considered by the panel and other relevant documents. The head of school/head of department will also notify the student as to who will be present at the meeting.
41. The student will be advised of the right to make a written submission to the panel and to appear before the panel in person. Where the student’s state of health makes it impossible or inadvisable to attend the meeting in person within a reasonable period of time, the panel may consider and determine the matter on the papers.
42. The student will be given at least one week’s notice in writing of the date of the panel meeting and will be advised of the right to be accompanied by up to two support persons.
Note - Such persons include a fellow student, a member of academic staff, a member of the Student Counselling Service or legal representative.
43. If the student wishes any other person to attend the meeting to provide evidence to the panel, the student must advise the head of school/ head of department as soon as practicable.
FTP Committee panel meeting
44. The FTP Committee panel meeting is a closed meeting and will be held in private.
45. Other persons, such as the Deputy Head (Academic) or equivalent and programme director or major / specialisation leader or equivalent, may be invited to be present during the meeting to provide information if required by the panel.
46. The chair will control the meeting procedure.
Procedure following the FTP panel meeting
47. Where the panel decides the matter, the chair of the FTP Committee will advise the student in writing of the panel's decision(s).
48. Where the panel makes a recommendation to the Dean, the Dean will advise the student in writing of the decision.
49. Where applicable, the student must be advised of the right to appeal the decision.
50. Where the Dean decides to terminate the enrolment of the student in the programme, the relevant head of school/ head of department must ensure that the student is given advice about other study options that may be available to the student.
Processing of FTP reports and record keeping
51. All reports (including notes of discussions) of issues that may affect a student's fitness to practise are to be recorded and submitted to the Deputy Head (Academic) or equivalent and programme director or major / specialisation leader or equivalent on a fitness to practise report form.
52. Notes, reports and other details relating to fitness to practise issues and the outcomes of any fitness to practise process will be retained in the student's file, in confidentially sealed envelopes, for a minimum of 7 years from the date of the student's graduation. This information may be disclosed to the relevant health profession authority where necessary for the health profession authority to discharge its responsibility to ensure that health professionals granted registration are competent to practise and are fit for registration and to practise, or where necessary to enable the health profession authority to put in place any additional arrangements or support that may be required to ensure the safety of the student and the public following registration.
Note - Record keeping requirements are shown in row 4 of Tables 1, 2 and 3 respectively.
53. The Deputy Head (Academic) or equivalent will maintain for audit purposes a secure, password-protected register which will record all fitness to practise issues and outcomes. This record must be kept for a minimum period of 7 years.
Definitions
The following definitions apply to this document:
Academic staff member refers to a member of the academic staff of the University, and includes an honorary teaching staff member and a teaching staff member whose services are engaged under a contract for service.
Dean refers to the Dean FS.
Deputy Dean refers to the Deputy Dean of FS.
Deputy Head (Academic) refers to the Deputy Head of Department (Academic) or equivalent role in an FS school or department.
Discipline includes the disciplines of physiotherapy and clinical psychology.
FS refers to the Faculty of Science at the University
FTP Committee means the FS Fitness to Practise Committee.
FTP Committee panel means the FS Fitness to Practise Committee panel convened by the chair of the FTP Committee to sit on a case by case basis, to investigate, decide and/or make recommendations to the Dean on a fitness to practise matter.
FTP Policy means the FS Fitness to Practise Policy.
FTP Procedures means the FS Fitness to Practise Procedures.
Head of School/Head of Department means the Head of a School or Head of Department within FS.
Health profession means the practice of a profession in respect of which an authority is appointed under the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003, and includes the practice of dietetics, practice of medicine, practice of nursing, practice of optometry, practice of medical imaging and practice of pharmacy, practice of physiotherapy and practice of clinical psychology.
Health profession authority means the body that is responsible for the registration and oversight of practitioners of a particular health profession under the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003.
Health professional student refers to a student on a programme of study delivered by FS leading to a new registration status in a health profession (i.e. pre-registration student), and to a student undertaking continuing professional development or advanced studies relating to their health profession which does not lead to a new registration status.
Tuākana refers to University-wide learning community, enhancing the academic success of Māori and Pacific students.
Panel refers to the FTP Committee panel.
Programme Director or Major / Specialisation Leader means the staff member responsible for co-ordinating the relevant health professional programme in which the student is studying or equivalent role in an FS school or department.
Provost refers to the Provost of the University of Auckland.
Staff member refers to an individual employed within FS whether on a full or part time basis, and includes an independent contractor.
Student means a health professional student.
Kaiārahi refers to the FS kaiārahi.
University means Waipapa Taumata Rau | University of Auckland and includes all subsidiaries.
Key relevant documents
Include the following:
Document management and control
Owner: Dean of FS
Content manager: Deputy Dean of FS
Approved by: Registrar
Date approved: 1 October 2021
Review date: 1 October 2024