The Auckland Health Research Ethics Committee (AHREC)
AHREC provides ethical oversight and approval of clinical research that is not eligible for review by a Health and Disability Ethics Committee (HDEC), and is carried out by staff and students of the University of Auckland and/or staff of the Auckland District Health Board (Auckland DHB) and/or Counties Manukau District Health Board (CM Health), when participants are recruited from these two DHBs. For University of Auckland staff and students: All clinical/health research studies must be submitted to AHREC from 22 May 2020. (For guidelines on what is defined as clinical/health research please see the Clinical Research Definition Guidelines).
This page contains the sections:
- What has changed for AHREC?
- What training is available?
- Infonetica Ethics RM online system link
- Infonetica Ethics RM quick reference guides
- Before completing the application
- Application process
- University of Auckland Office of Ethics and Integrity Team
- Complete and submit an application
- Meetings and submission deadlines
- Amendments to ethics protocols after approval
What has changed for AHREC?
As part of the introduction of Ethics RM for AHREC, the following major changes in the current submission process should be noted:
- AHREC eligibility criteria expanded to include CM Health
Note: Non-University of Auckland applicants can get access to Infonetica Ethics RM by applying to the University of Auckland for a username and password. Please refer to the Infonetica Ethics RM Quick Reference Guide – Onboarding for External Users.• Clinical / health research ethics applicationsFrom 22 May 2020, all clinical and health research ethics applications must seek AHREC approval, or if in scope, HDEC approval. From this point on, University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee (UAHPEC) will no longer accept applications for clinical research studies.Guidelines providing a definition of clinical research and examples of what is / isn’t clinical research will be accessible from the information icons in Ethics RM.• Applications involving the use of human tissueAll applications involving the use of human tissue as part of the research must now seek AHREC not UAHPEC approval e.g. use of DNA to improve forensic analysis.
- The scope of the AHREC ethics committee has expanded to provide ethical oversight and approval of clinical research (not eligible for review by a (HDEC), carried out by staff and students of the University of Auckland, the Auckland DHB and CM Health when participants are recruited from the two DHBs.
- The AHREC review process will include locality/management approval for the University of Auckland, Auckland DHB and CM Health studies that fulfil the eligibility criteria for AHREC review.
- Student ethics application process
- All students (PhD, Masters and Honours Students) can complete their AHREC ethics applications in the Ethics RM system.
- Note: PhD and Masters students will automatically have access to Ethics RM but access for Honours students will need to be requested by the academic supervisor once for each academic course. Please see step 1 of the Infonetica Ethics RM Quick Reference Guide – Create a Student Application Guide for details on how to request Honours student access to Ethics RM.
- Student applications can be initiated in three ways:
1. The academic supervisor can create the shell of the application and share the application with the student: The academic supervisor or principal investigator (PI) can first create a ‘shell’ of the application (completing minimal details - project title and principal investigator / supervisor name) and share the application with the student for completion. Please refer to the Infonetica Ethics RM Quick Reference Guide – Sharing an Application.
Once the student has completed the application in Ethics RM, they must then request their academic supervisor or PI to review and submit their application for Academic Head sign-off.
2. The student can create the application, transfer ownership of the application to their academic supervisor or PI and request they share the application with them:
The student can initiate and complete the application form in Ethics RM noting their academic supervisor or PI as the Principal Investigator for the application.
Once complete, the student must then transfer ownership of the application to their academic supervisor or PI and request they share the application with them. (This is necessary because a student is not permitted to submit an application for Academic Head review – the academic supervisor or PI is responsible for submission). Please refer to the Infonetica Ethics RM Quick Reference Guide – Transfer Application.
3. A Word version of the UAHPEC application form will be available for students to complete so that supervisors can continue to provide feedback on a student’s application using Word tracked changes prior to entering the application details online. Once the Word version application is finalised the student can copy the content into the online Ethics RM form and request submission by their academic supervisor or PI as detailed above.
- Request for Academic Head sign-off
Applicants will need to add the name of their Academic Head (or delegated sign-off) once the application is ready for submission. Once signed-off, the application will automatically be sent on to the Ethics and Integrity team for further processing. Please refer to the Infonetica Ethics RM Quick Reference Guide – Submitting an Application for Sign-Off. A list of Academic Heads (or delegates) who will provide sign-off will be available from the sign-off page in Ethics RM.
(Any up-dates to this list should be sent to firstname.lastname@example.org)
- Amendment request process
For a period of time, amendments to an approved AHREC ethics application will be managed in two ways, depending on how the initial application was processed.
More details of some of the benefits of using Ethics RM can be found in AHREC Ethics Process Key Changes.
- If the initial application was previously submitted by email (prior to Ethics RM being implemented), the amendment request should be emailed as a PDF to email@example.com, using the current amendment request form (see link to the form below).
- If the initial application was submitted using Ethics RM, any amendment requests should be initiated through the Ethics RM system. Please refer to the Infonetica Ethics RM Quick Reference Guide – Amendment Request.
What training is available?
Quick reference guides are now available from the Infonetica Ethics RM Guides section below to provide guidance on how to use Ethics RM.
In addition, classroom training sessions are being offered by POD at the Grafton campus.
Please click on the links below to book into one of the available training sessions:
Link to online system
Infonetica Ethics RM Guides
Applicant and Collaborator Guides
Academic Head / Departmental Sign-Off Guides
Committee Chair and Reviewer Guides
Before completing the application
If a study is not eligible for review by an HDEC and involves recruiting human participants from the geographic region served by the Auckland DHB or CM Health as well as from one or more additional DHBs, the application must be submitted to AHREC.
UAHPEC will no longer accept applications for clinical/health research studies. All clinical research ethics applications must seek Auckland Health Research Ethics Committee (AHREC) approval, or if in scope, Health and Disability Ethics Committee (HDEC) approval.
In addition, UAHPEC will no longer accept applications involving the use of human tissue in the research – these applications should seek AHREC approval.
Preparing the application
- Go through the AHREC Manual. This manual outlines the mandatory items that must be included in the application and other information essential for making ethics applications.
- Please ensure that your application is complete. Incomplete applications will be returned to the applicant for completion. The AHREC will not review the application until it is complete.
- Failure to comply with all requirements outlined in the Manual will result in the application being returned to the applicant for revision.
- Please proofread your application and public documents closely and ensure that these are edited by someone with an excellent grasp of English.
There are two pathways for review of AHREC ethics applications: expedited review and full review.
A research project in which there is deemed to be a low risk of physical harm, psychological harm, exploitation or other potential adverse effect will be reviewed via an expedited review process. Expedited applications will be reviewed by one Committee member and the Chair outside of the Committee meetings. The turnaround time for applications is usually about three weeks from the time of submission of the application.
Examples of low-risk studies are those that:
- require access to health information only, where the person accessing the data is involved in the clinical service provision in that clinical area
- involve administration of low risk procedures (e.g. interviews, questionnaires, etc.) not as part of clinical care and not involving vulnerable participants
- observation only of clinical processes by members of the clinical team.
During the expedited ethical review, reviewers may recommend that the application is referred to the Committee for full review.
Any research not qualifying for an expedited review will be placed on the next AHREC agenda for review at a Committee meeting. Each application will be reviewed by two Committee members prior to the meeting, and an outcome determined after Committee discussion of the application. After each AHREC meeting the Ethics Administrators will inform PIs of the Committee decision within five working days. The turnaround time for applications is usually about four weeks from the time of submission of the application.
Ethics and Integrity Team
For any queries about an AHREC application, please contact an Administrator in the Ethics and Integrity Team.
Should you need any advice and guidance regarding your application, please make an appointment to speak with an ethics advisor well before the submission closing dates (see submission closing dates below).
Dr Elizabeth Visser
Ethics and Integrity Manager
Phone: Ext 83711
Phone: Ext 85405
For support and advice on dealing with project-specific ethical issues -
Faculties of Business and Economics, Creative Arts and
Industries, Engineering, and Medical and Health Sciences, and ABI
Phone: Ext 88293
For support and advice on dealing with project-specific ethical issues - Faculties of Education and Social Work, Science, Law, Arts and the Liggins Institute.
Phone: Ext 81338
The Principal Investigator (PI) of a study must submit the ethics application for ethics review. For student research (including Doctoral, Masters and Honurs), applications should be submitted by the primary supervisor who will be named as the PI.
Meetings and submission deadlines
Applicants can request to attend a meeting to discuss their ethics application with the Committee. However, the Committee reserves the right to close the meeting at any time. Please contact the Ethics and Integrity Team to advise the committee if you wish to attend a meeting. The Committee may also request that an applicant attend.
Amendments to ethics protocols after approval
Minor amendment requests are approved by the AHREC Chair under delegation, but any major changes to a protocol will be reviewed at the next AHREC meeting.
If you have any questions about the amendment request process please contact the Ethics and Integrity Team.
Once the study has concluded, the Principal Investigator must submit a final report to AHREC. The report must be submitted as an attachment to firstname.lastname@example.org, with the AHREC reference number and “Final Report” in the email’s subject line. The report will be reviewed by the Committee via the Expedited Review process. No further action will be necessary, unless the Committee wishes to discuss the report at a meeting.