Draft Freedom of Expression Statement frequently asked questions

Questions and answers to support staff and students in responding to the draft Freedom of Expression Statement.

Why is the University drafting a freedom of expression statement?

The New Zealand Government has proposed amendments to the Education and Training Act 2020 through the Education and Training Amendment Bill (No 2) (the Bill) that will require all university councils to adopt a statement on freedom of expression. This statement will set out the University’s commitment to upholding freedom of speech in alignment with the principles in the Bill.

How was this draft freedom of expression statement developed?

Distinguished Professor Sir Peter Hunter has drafted the freedom of expression statement with support from colleagues including Professor Nikki Harré and members of the Vice-Chancellor’s Advisory Group on Freedom of Expression. The draft closely matches language used in the Education and Training Amendment Bill (No 2).  

Who are the members of the Vice-Chancellor’s Advisory Group on Freedom of Expression?

Deputy Vice-Chancellor Operations and Registrar (Chair) – Adrienne Cleland
Deputy Vice-Chancellor Education – Professor Simon Holdaway
Pro Vice-Chancellor Māori – Professor Te Kawehau Hoskins
Pro Vice-Chancellor Pacific – Professor Jemaima Tiatia-Siau
Pro Vice-Chancellor Equity – Professor Cathy Stinear
Director of Communications and Engagement – Kiri Coughlan
Distinguished Professor Sir Peter Hunter
Deputy General Counsel – Sarah Hine
Employment Relations Manager – Katherine Burson

What does the Education and Training Act Amendment Bill (No. 2) require of universities?

If the Education and Training Amendment Bill (No 2) (the Bill) is passed in its current form, Council will be required to:

  1. Protect and promote freedom of expression (in addition to Council’s existing duty to protect and promote academic freedom in section 267 of the Education Training Act 2020).
  2. Adopt a freedom of expression statement that is consistent with the principles in item 5. below which include the requirement that universities will not take positions on matters that do not directly concern their role or functions.
  3. Report in the University’s annual report on how Council has complied with its duties to protect and promote academic freedom and freedom of expression which will include conducting regular surveys of students and staff.
  4. Establish and maintain a formal process for receiving, recording, and reporting on complaints related to academic freedom and freedom of expression.
  5. Adopt a freedom of expression statement that is consistent with the following:
    1. Universities should recognise that freedom of expression is critical to maintaining academic freedom
    2. Universities should actively foster an environment where ideas can be challenged, controversial issues can be discussed, and diverse opinions can be expressed, in a respectful manner consistent with any statute made by the university
    3. Universities’ policies and procedures relating to freedom of expression should be clear, consistently applied, and focused on fostering genuine debate rather than restricting it
    4. Universities should not take positions on matters that do not directly concern their role or functions
    5. Universities should not limit the freedom of expression of staff or students, except where the exercise of free expression is likely to be unlawful or to disrupt the ordinary activities of the university
    6. Universities should seek to uphold their role as critic and conscience of society by providing a platform for invited speakers (defined as speakers invited by staff or student associations/clubs) of diverse viewpoints
    7. Universities should not deny the use of university premises by an invited speaker because of that speaker’s ideas or opinions

The Bill has had its First Reading and is currently before the Education and Workforce Select Committee. Changes to the above may be made based on the public submissions made to the select committee. The select committee is due to report to Parliament on 16 September 2025.  

What is the difference between an institutional policy on freedom of expression, like the drafts previously proposed, and a statement?

A policy is a mandatory set of rules and procedures that guides decision-making, sets requirements for behaviour, and details how issues will be managed. A statement is a high-level declaration of the University’s position on a topic – in this case, freedom of expression. While a policy contains enforceable requirements, a statement expresses the University’s philosophy and principles, providing a reference point for our community and the public.  

How does freedom of expression relate to academic freedom?

Freedom of expression is a broad right held by everyone in New Zealand to express their opinions, ideas, and beliefs and is protected by the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. Academic freedom is a specific right held by academic staff and students to teach, research, and communicate findings and enter into public debate on matters relevant to their professional expertise and experience subject to certain limitations. Academic freedom is protected under section 267 of the Education and Training Act 2020.  

Will the University still be able to limit certain kinds of speech?

Yes. The right to freedom of expression is not absolute. Expression must be lawful which means that University members must comply with laws that restrict speech (such as prohibitions against inciting violence, discrimination, or harassment) and comply with privacy laws and contractual obligations. The University must also comply with its duties under laws such as the Human Rights Act 1993, the Education (Pastoral Care of Tertiary and International Learners) Code of Practice 2021 [PDF, 443.39 KB], and the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 while promoting free expression.  

How will the freedom of expression survey be developed and reported?

The Minister for Universities has asked Universities New Zealand to form a working group to propose a set of survey questions and a reporting approach that will be used across all universities. Standardising the questions across all institutions will support national benchmarking. Surveying is expected to begin in 2026, and results will be published in university annual reports.  

What are the next steps in adopting the Freedom of Expression Statement?

Feedback on this draft statement is being sought from academic and professional staff via faculty meetings and an online feedback form, and from students via the Student Consultative Group, in advance of the 17 November Senate meeting. Council will receive a summary of all feedback and themes, together with advice from Senate, for consideration at its 10 December meeting.