Capital Expenditure Committee
The Capital Expenditure Committee is a committee of The University of Auckland Council, with the delegated responsibilities, authorities and accountabilities set out in this Terms of Reference approved by Council.
The purpose of the Capital Expenditure Committee is to ensure that all major capital expenditure is supported by a quality proposal, advances the University’s strategic objectives and is financially sustainable.
The Capital Expenditure Committee is responsible for considering all capital expenditure proposals over $2.5 million, with a particular focus on:
- the contribution each proposal would make to achievement of Strategic Plan objectives, and
- the financial sustainability of each proposal
A ‘capital expenditure proposal’ means a proposal for the:
- acquisition of land, or
- acquisition, extension, modification or refurbishment of a building, or
- acquisition of a piece of equipment, or
- acquisition or development of an IT system or application, or
- acquisition of shares or equity like investments outside of investing the University’s working capital, or
- acquisition of a work of art
where the resulting expenditure would be capitalised under the University’s Accounting Policies.
In addition, a "capital expenditure proposal" shall also be deemed to include a write-off, write-down, disposal or demolition of assets currently capitalised as well as long-term leases whose size and duration of commitment is akin to capital expenditure. (For the avoidance of doubt, all new or renewed leases where the undiscounted committed lease payments exceed $2.5 million shall be treated as "capital expenditure".)
‘Financially sustainable’ means a position where the University, in the medium to long term, satisfies its targeted operating, cashflow and balance sheet parameters, whether set by the Council or monitored as a risk criterion by TEC, or covenanted to in connection with any borrowing undertaken.
The Capital Expenditure Committee, at its discretion, may request management to provide progress or milestone reports relating to particular capital expenditure approvals. A Post Implementation Review (PIR) will be presented to the Capital Expenditure Committee where so required by the University's Post Implementation Review Policy.
The Committee will consider proposals only on the signed written recommendation of the Vice-Chancellor. Proposals forwarded by the Vice-Chancellor for the Committee’s consideration will normally have been previously considered and recommended by the relevant members of the Senior Leadership Team.
The Vice-Chancellor’s covering note shall summarise his/her assessment of the proposal’s relative capacity to advance the University’s strategic objectives in a financially sustainable manner.
Proposals must comprise business case in support of the proposal, and a quality assurance report.
3.1 Business Cases
The business case in support of a proposal should be prepared by and signed by the Dean or Director of the sponsoring Faculty, Large Scale Research Institute or Service Division. The business case must comprise:
- a summary of the proposal including, as appropriate:
- a textual description
- plans, specifications and visuals
- a costing
- an outline of the project delivery strategy, including the proposed approach to contracting, project management arrangements and a programme
- the strategic case for the proposed expenditure, which must be based on the Strategic Plan and outline how, directly or indirectly, the proposal will enhance the achievement of the Strategic Plan objectives, including the impact on:
- teaching quality
- postgraduate completions
- research activity and external research income
- student and staff experience
- the University’s standing
- the business case for the proposed expenditure, including:
- an outline of the proposed or projected capital expenditure, operating expenditure and revenue resulting from or required by the project, with analysis supporting all material assumptions and judgements
- an outline of any proposed philanthropic or sponsorship or other external support, including specification of any minimum level which the proposal is contingent on
- an outline of risks arising from the proposal, and risk management strategies
- projected operating and cash flow statements
- return on investment and/or net present value
Where realistic options to the recommended proposal exist and were considered, the Committee should also be provided with an outline of those options and a statement of the reasons for selecting the recommended option.
3.2 Financial Sustainability Reports
Each proposal must be accompanied by a financial sustainability report prepared by and signed by the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Operations) and Registrar.
This report should advise how the recommended level of expenditure compares with any provision made for the proposal in the University’s capital budget for the current year, and the most recent revision of the Capital Plan and Financial Projections. If the proposal is recommended at a materially higher level of expenditure than provided for in the Capital Plan and Financial Projections, then the report should outline the impact of the proposal on the University’s financial position and the University’s capacity to fund the proposal.The financial sustainability report should also indicate whether or not there have been any changes in circumstances, since the last revision of the Capital Plan and Financial Projections, which have had or are expected to have a material adverse impact on the University’s financial position. Where this is the case, the report should include an interim update of the Financial Projections demonstrating:
- the actual or expected impact of the change(s) in circumstances, and
- the impact on the University’s financial position of the proposed capital expenditure, and
- the financial sustainability of the proposed capital expenditure in light of the change(s) in circumstances
If the proposal is contingent on a minimum committed level of new philanthropic or sponsorship support, the financial sustainability report must include a note prepared and signed by the Director of External Relations and Development outlining the proposed approach and confirming it is consistent with and integrated into the University’s overall approach.
4. Review of Terms of Reference
The Committee shall review its Terms of Reference and report to Council the outcome of that review every year.
The Committee shall comprise the Chancellor and Pro-Chancellor, the Vice-Chancellor, and the Chairs of the Finance and Audit and Risk Committees.
Council may also appoint 1 or 2 of its lay members as additional members of the Committee.The Chancellor is the Chair of the Committee and the Chair of the Finance Committee is the Deputy Chairperson.
6. Term of Appointment
The term of office of each member of the Committee will be one year.
The Vice-Chancellor (or the Director of Administration on his behalf) will call a meeting of the Committee whenever there is a proposal to consider. With the agreement of the Chair, the Committee may meet by postal ballot, provided the required papers accompany the proposed resolution and no Committee member requests a meeting.
8. Management Attendance
The following members of management will normally attend meetings of the Committee:
- the Director of Administration,
- the Director of Finance,
- the Director of Property Services (in the case of proposals relating to property), and
- the Dean(s) and/or Director(s) sponsoring or otherwise directly responsible for the proposal to be considered.
- The Chief Digital Officer (in the case of proposals relating to IT)
9. Secretarial Support
The Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Operations) and Registrar will provide secretarial support for the Committee, and ensure that a complete record of the proceedings of the Committee including agendas, minutes and papers, proposals, advice and reports provided to the Committee is maintained in permanent form with the Registrar.
The Committee has delegated authority to approve capital expenditure proposals greater than $2.5 million and less than $25 million. The Committee’s delegated authority is subject to the condition that total capital expenditure in the current financial year, whether approved by the Committee or otherwise, shall not exceed by more than $5 million the budgeted total capital expenditure for the year.
Where a capital expenditure proposal exceeds $25 million, the Committee shall make a recommendation to Council concerning approval of the proposal.
Minutes of each meeting of the Committee, recording proposals approved and/or recommendations to Council shall be provided to the following meeting of Council.Where the Committee has approved a proposal under its delegated authority, a copy of all papers considered by the Committee relating to the proposal shall be kept in the Vice-Chancellor’s Office for inspection on request by Council members.
12. Conflicts of Interest
Committee members must declare any real or perceived conflicts of interest in line with the requirements of the University’s Conflicts of Interest Policy.
Committee members have a responsibility to treat all information with appropriate confidentiality. This includes matters tabled or discussed at the Committee meetings, as well as any additional issues that are raised outside meetings.
Schedule of Meetings
|Thursday 25 May 2017||11:00am|
Meetings are convened when necessary.